Friday, March 17, 2017
//##gibberText##v:0.1##kid:82402309-1fdd-4faf-acf0-ba5b87204467##%7B'iv'%3A'SyfGUlwf9R2jozHOFuj%2FBA%3D%3D'%2C'v'%3A1%2C'iter'%3A1000%2C'ks'%3A128%2C'ts'%3A64%2C'mode'%3A'ccm'%2C'adata'%3A''%2C'cipher'%3A'aes'%2C'salt'%3A'9VwhQcdG62k%3D'%2C'ct'%3A'j3%2BWwJLduSy60OPeJ2%2FSbA1WiXmtwNaC%2FPj0TijEbZwRkl%2FlMWUN7qredmwqKxXpRIs8PyiEjWWKQelDXZDwK3fbGRiWupZ7xhkrVeFnFMH2XwvjWfNT98arK2rK2%2FtkwVWzcnd7H3rN9hf3VPXVnscwtA51ThpG%2FM0tX4xrzDHHTFqE3QU1duTq0nNGQV5Aee0vCJPorKTsgqd9s5eXDdRuA0%2FecbkcuW5d8mm1LHRcLB7kGHrYE04jWXKrD4uqZoQeTEwNSTnCcqD7q%2Bpgm%2BrrMnw2XxpgMPEHqQ9Sc72RmQ1cjdnBOmQwUsr%2Bru%2B14QlTBqnm26QJrgGXg2e4W1HUtBhS2sep%2BuCVnJDcfYtCpr4SiF0SfImgCmvp7LdYTUm6ghn2gzCPg5iCS739g2IKpu5%2FqaAhfV%2BUUmeOtWja5Nh97Cb2Rfy6cWTKipwyOQSn42fSFnrbOsYvRHzbK2U%3D'%7D##// This message was encrypted with GibberIt - http://gibber.it
Thursday, March 16, 2017
Monday, March 14, 2016
There is also a danger that the Custom Code will be lost or stolen. The more often Apple must use the forensic capability this Court is ordering it to create, the more people have to have access to it. The more people who have access to the Custom Code, the more likely it will leak. The software will be valuable to anyone eager to bypass security measures on one of the most secure smartphones on the market. The incentive to steal the Custom Code is huge. The Custom Code would be invaluable to identity thieves, blackmailers, and those engaged in corporate espionage and intellectual property theft, to name a few.
Thursday, February 11, 2016
“Huge” number of Mac apps vulnerable to hijacking, and a fix is elusive | Ars Technica: Fellow researcher Simone Margaritelli has developed a technique that streamlines the attack by allowing it to work with the Metasploit exploit framework. He showed how he could exploit the vulnerability on a fully patched Mac running the latest version of the VLC Media Player. VLC developers released an update three days ago that patches the vulnerability so that the attack no longer works against the latest version.Patch your VLC, people:
Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Why Stack Overflow Doesn’t Care About Ad Blockers – Stack Overflow Blog – A destination for all things related to development at Stack Overflow
As an interesting follow-on to Wired's article earlier today, see the this post by StackOverflow regarding its advertising policy:
Well done, StackOverflow.
But really: anything that doesn’t speak specifically to the Stack Overflow audience is not permitted. We also don’t accept rich media like animated ads, expandable ads, or video, which are the norm for most publishers today. This strict policy means we leave money on the table, but our team wants to protect Stack Overflow from those kinds of ads, as they run the risk of alienating that established trust.For those of you that don't know, StackOverflow is a forum where users go to post software development / programming questions and answers. It is one of the single most valuable resources available to any developer out there - I have used it more times than I care to count. To put it mildly, they have very high street cred, and this policy seems totally consistent with that reputation.
Well done, StackOverflow.
How WIRED Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking | WIRED: You can subscribe to a brand-new Ad-Free version of WIRED.com. For $1 a week, you will get complete access to our content, with no display advertising or ad tracking.The above article mentions that WIRED now allows you to easily whitelist its site, or, for $1 a week, you can have an ad-free viewing experience.
While I do not think this is a perfect solution, I think it is a huge step in the right direction, made in good faith. Importantly, it recognizes something so fundamental that so many other subscription services do not seem to grasp:
If I pay for a subscription, it must be both advertisement free and not track my data.
Any other stance is simply going to result in more users using ad-blockers or resorting to more aggressive forms of content-piracy. To be completely frank, it is why I do not, and will not, pay for Hulu.
Kudos, Wired. Here's hoping other publications follow suit.
Monday, January 18, 2016
Apple is not Vertically Integrated (Response to 'Why Big Companies Keep Failing: The Stack Fallacy' | TechCrunch)
Why Big Companies Keep Failing: The Stack Fallacy | TechCrunch: Apple continues to successfully integrate vertically down — building chips, programming languages, etc., but again has found it very hard to go up the stack and build those simple apps — things like photo sharing apps and maps.
This is super confusing to read from Techcrunch. Surely @anushublog is aware of the fact that Apple is not an OEM and is actually nowhere near vertically integrated? They are a design shop, and up until very recently, 100% of their manufacture was outsourced.
Additionally, one of Apple's core competencies is its software - iphoto is actually great. Apple Maps is not amazing - but certainly way better than it used to be. Apple's messenger app is great. Its mail app is great. Its video editing software (Final Cut Pro) and music editing software (Logic Pro) are actually industry standards.
This is pretty careless, IMO. Maybe the point is that Apple is bad at making social-media apps? Well, maybe. But they likely make more money off of social media apps than ~99% of social media app publishers, due to their ownership of the App Store.
That aside, the fundamental point of the article - that Product Management is very hard - is a good lesson.